tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-90268409790626315982024-02-19T09:01:05.043-08:00My Book-It ListJust a little place for me to share my opinions on whatever book I've just finished reading. Feel free to add your two cents, if I happen to review a book you've already read. I'd love to hear all different viewpoints.Missyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-80043100395924357482011-07-13T21:51:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:14:08.878-07:00Lies That Chelsea Handler Told Me by Chelsea's Family, Friends and Other Victims<em>Note from me: Please excuse how brief this review is. My grandmother passed away today and I just can't see myself being able to write a thorough review, but at the same time I don't want to put this off.</em><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/LiesThatChelseaHandlerToldMe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" m$="true" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/LiesThatChelseaHandlerToldMe.jpg" width="216" /></a></div><strong>Synopsis</strong><br />
<div></div><em>It's no lie: Chelsea Handler likes to smoke out "dumbasses," the condition people suffer from that allows them to fall prey to her brand of complete and utter nonsense. Family, friends, and coworkers have all been tricked by Chelsea into believing stories of total foolishness and into behaving like total fools. Luckily, they've lived to tell the tales and, for the very first time, write about their humiliating experiences.</em><br />
<br />
<div></div><em>It doesn't matter if you're minding your own business, busily working, or honeymooning thousands of miles away. No one is ever safe from Chelsea's fake e-mail and phony pregnancies, bogus smuggling schemes and made-up sports bets. Because whether it's premeditated or spur-of-the-moment, Chelsea will do anything for a laugh. And that's the truth.</em><br />
<br />
<div></div>---<br />
<ol><li><em>Chelsea Chelsea Bang Bang</em></li>
<li><em>Lies That Chelsea Handler Told Me</em></li>
<li><em>My Horizontal Life</em></li>
<li><em>Are You There, Vodka? It's Me, Chelsea</em></li>
</ol>That is the order in which I like Chelsea Handler's book.<br />
<br />
This book was very funny. I found myself laughing out loud, quite frequently. Granted...99% of this book wasn't actually written by Chelsea, but you can still appreciate it as a "Chelsea Handler" book.<br />
<br />
As abusive as Chelsea comes off in her many pranks, I found myself actually wanting to be her friend. She abuses cause she cares.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, read it. I really enjoyed it.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-17947860388529402132011-06-13T08:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:13:30.968-07:00Diary: A Novel by Chuck Palahnuik<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/DiaryANovel.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/DiaryANovel.jpg" t8="true" width="200" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Diary takes the form of a “coma diary” kept by one Misty Tracy Wilmot as her husband lies senseless in a hospital after a suicide attempt. Once she was an art student dreaming of creativity and freedom; now, after marrying Peter at school and being brought back to once quaint, now tourist-overrun Waytansea Island, she’s been reduced to the condition of a resort hotel maid. Peter, it turns out, has been hiding rooms in houses he’s remodeled and scrawling vile messages all over the walls—an old habit of builders but dramatically overdone in Peter’s case. Angry homeowners are suing left and right, and Misty’s dreams of artistic greatness are in ashes. But then, as if possessed by the spirit of Maura Kinkaid, a fabled Waytansea artist of the nineteenth century, Misty begins painting again, compulsively. But can her newly discovered talent be part of a larger, darker plan? Of course it can…</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Where do I even start? This book was the epitome of an enigma for me. I both hated and yet somehow enjoyed (though that isn't really the right word) this book. It was strange. I found myself completely uninterested in the story, but at the same time couldn't seem to put it down.<br />
<br />
I just can't even begin to get into this book. The plot was so completely confusing to me, but oddly I still managed to see the end coming. It was just an all around weird book. I found factual errors within the writing, but the characters themselves are so completely off the deep end that I don't know if these mistakes were intentional to reflect the mindsets or if Palahnuik just flat out got it wrong.<br />
<br />
I just really don't know.<br />
<br />
Bottom line...I DON'T KNOW!!! I guess, read it and judge for yourself. Maybe you could explain to me what I just read.<br />
<br />
*sigh*<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-45347045606328006672011-06-11T08:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:13:09.326-07:00Jane by April Lindner<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/Jane.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/Jane.jpg" t8="true" width="211" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<span id="freeText16400127030308902616"><em>Forced to drop out of an esteemed East Coast college after the sudden death of her parents, Jane Moore takes a nanny job at Thornfield Park, the estate of Nico Rathburn, an iconic rock star on the brink of a huge comeback. Practical and independent, Jane reluctantly becomes entranced by her magnetic and brooding employer, and finds herself in the midst of a forbidden romance. But there's a mystery at Thornfield, and Jane's much-envied relationship with Nico is tested by a torturous secret from his past.<br />
<br />
Part irresistible romance and part darkly engrossing mystery, this contemporary retelling of the beloved classic</em> Jane Eyre <em>promises to enchant a new generation of readers.</em></span><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
I had mixed feelings about this book. As you'll remember from my earlier review, I loved <em>Jane Eyre.</em> That's why I opted to read this book. I wanted to see how Lindner would go about updating the story and giving it her own little twist.<br />
<br />
For those familiar with <em>Jane Eyre</em>, references to it are easy to spot, even outside of the plot. Some things however did not translate as well as others. In <em>Jane Eyre</em>, with Jane first encounters Mr. Rochester, the reader can understand why she doesn't know who he is from sight. She's never met the man and has seen no pictures. In <em>Jane</em>, Jane's first meeting with Rathburn is...confusing. Prior to her starting the job, the book goes into great detail about Jane going online and researching him. Her inability to know who he is makes zero sense and there's absolutely no adequate explanation given.<br />
<br />
I also found some of the renaming of characters to be a little...lame. To begin with, you don't even really need to keep the names similar to their original counterparts. Those who've read <em>Jane Eyre</em> can make the connection on their own and those who haven't don't need to know. While the occasional name similarities were a nice nod to the <em>Jane Eyre</em> fans, naming Rathburn's dog Copilot was beyond stupid, in my opinion.<br />
<br />
I was really hoping Rathburn's big secret wasn't going to be <em>exactly</em> as it was in <em>Jane Eyre</em> and was marginally disappointed when that turned out to not be the case. It would have in my opinion made the story just that much better. I don't know <em>what</em> it should have been changed to, but it would have been nice for the big twist to have been another "Oh my god" moment.<br />
<br />
Like I said before, I started reading this book because of my enjoyment of <em>Jane Eyre.</em> As I read it though, something occurred to me. Is it really fair that an author can piggyback on someone else's work...and especially for their debut novel. I realize that writing a novel isn't easy, but I would imagine that having the entire plot handed to you and only needing to update a few key points makes it significantly easier. While the idea is good in theory, I can't help but feel that retelling someone else's book is just short of cheating.<br />
<br />
Alright. Enough about what I didn't like. On to what I <em>did</em> like.<br />
<br />
I found myself able to relate to Jane a lot easier than I did, while reading <em>Jane Eyre.</em> I think putting her in the modern world and placing her in situations more familiar to myself, I could see more of myself in her. I found myself feeling that I was/am Jane. I really liked that.<br />
<br />
I also found the love story between Jane and Rathburn to be easier to relate to, for pretty much the same reasons. I can't understand the world <em>Jane Eyre</em> occurs in, but the setting of <em>Jane</em> I could completely get. It made the love story all the more enchanting.<br />
<br />
Bottom line...read it, I guess? If you like <em>Jane Eyre</em>, I think you might enjoy seeing how Lindner put a new spin on it. If you haven't read <em>Jane Eyre,</em> I think this book could hook you enough to get you to read the original piece.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-4680876913091120142011-06-09T08:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:12:44.023-07:00Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter by Seth Grahame-Smith<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/AbrahamLincolnVampireHunter.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/AbrahamLincolnVampireHunter.jpg" t8="true" width="212" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Indiana, 1818. Moonlight falls through the dense woods that surround a one-room cabin, where a nine-year-old Abraham Lincoln kneels at his suffering mother's bedside. She's been stricken with something the old-timers call "Milk Sickness."</em><br />
<br />
<em>"My baby boy..." she whispers before dying.</em><br />
<br />
<em>Only later will the grieving Abe learn that his mother's fatal affliction was actually the work of a vampire.</em><br />
<br />
<em>When the truth becomes known to young Lincoln, he writes in his journal, "henceforth my life shall be one of rigorous study and devotion. I shall become a master of mind and body. And this mastery shall have but one purpose..." Gifted with his legendary height, strength, and skill with an ax, Abe sets out on a path of vengeance that will lead him all the way to the White House.</em><br />
<br />
<em>While Abraham Lincoln is widely lauded for saving a Union and freeing millions of slaves, his valiant fight against the forces of the undead has remained in the shadows for hundreds of years. That is, until Seth Grahame-Smith stumbled upon The Secret Journal of Abraham Lincoln, and became the first living person to lay eyes on it in more than 140 years.</em><br />
<br />
<em>Using the journal as his guide and writing in the grand biographical style of Doris Kearns Goodwin and David McCullough, Seth has reconstructed the true life story of our greatest president for the first time-all while revealing the hidden history behind the Civil War and uncovering the role vampires played in the birth, growth, and near-death of our nation.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
This was a really good book. I enjoyed it so much. I'll admit that I went into it with a completely false idea of what it was going to be like and, while it didn't live up to those expectations, it more than made-up for it in being what it actually was. I was expecting a comical book. Abraham Lincoln fighting vampires? How could it not be funny. What it actually turned out to be was a "true" re-telling of his life as a vampire hunter. True, it was humorous in a tongue-in-cheek, deadpan sort of way, but it wasn't laugh-out-loud funny like I was expecting.<br />
<br />
In recent years, there has been a sudden surge in the "Found Material" genre of movies, i.e. <em>The Blair Witch Project, Paranormal Activity</em>, etc. I'm a huge fan of those types of movies and it was very interesting to read a book that falls into the same genre. The book is presented as both a novel and a work of fiction, in a way. You're presented with facts about Lincoln's life with fictional accounts of his time hunting vampires woven in. I loved that. Having concrete facts (AND PICTURES!!) within this work of fiction almost made me read this as something one might find in the Biography section of any book store. Amazing.<br />
<br />
Another thing I enjoyed about the book was it's tendency to put a vampiric spin on actual facts. Real moments in history are attributed to the work of vampires and the explanations we've read in our history books are merely cover-ups to protect us from the truth. Like I previously stated, this style of storytelling made it so I felt as if I was reading an actual biography more than a fantasy story. I actually <em>learned</em> things, while reading it. I spent just as much time Googling fact about Lincoln's life as I did actually reading the book. Incredible.<br />
<br />
Favorite part of the book? Hands down, the final chapter. I don't want to give anything away, but I absolutely loved it. Had I not accidentally dropped the book on my way to bed one night and caught a glimpse of the final page, I would have been even more blown away and not had a sense of what was coming, when I began to read the first page of the chapter. Even then, I was still surprised. Well played, Mr. Grahame-Smith.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, as if you don't see this coming, a definite read. Saves the Vampire genre from the massacre it's had to endure thanks to <em>Twilight</em>. I think everyone would enjoy it. I honestly can't think of a single reason someone would come away with a negative review...unless they're crazy into Lincoln and view it as an affront to his good name. In that case, do you really care that much about their opinion? Didn't think so.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-37552021245482528782011-06-07T08:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:11:50.081-07:00Tipping the Velvet by Sarah Waters<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/TippingtheVelvet.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/TippingtheVelvet.jpg" t8="true" width="200" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>This delicious, steamy debut novel chronicles the adventures of Nan King, who begins life as an oyster girl in the provincial seaside town of Whitstable and whose fortunes are forever changed when she falls in love with a cross-dressing music-hall singer named Miss Kitty Butler.</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>When Kitty is called up to London for an engagement on "Grease Paint Avenue", Nan follows as her dresser and secret lover, and, soon after, dons trousers herself and joins the act. In time, Kitty breaks her heart, and Nan assumes the guise of butch roue to commence her own thrilling and varied sexual education - a sort of Moll Flanders in drag - finally finding friendship and true love in the most unexpected places.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
So this book took a downward progression for me, as it went on. In the end, I did enjoy it, but as I made my way through it, I found myself beginning to like it less and less.<br />
<br />
To begin with, there were certain twists in the story that I saw coming pages in advance. I have to give Waters some leniency, since this was her debut novel, but still...a lot of the plot seemed to follow a fairly predictable formula, at times. Events that were meant to shock or surprise me were entirely expected on my part.<br />
<br />
Then there's the character of Nancy. I started the book liking her. She seemed like a completely together and likable girl. Then, all of the sudden I found myself being completely annoyed and put-off by her. She went from being this strong, independent girl and just suddenly became this weak, whiny thing. I hated it. She redeemed herself in the end, but I just didn't like the way her character changed, at times.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, I'll say...read it. For all its flaws, it's a better-than-decent read. I've read one other book by Waters and I didn't enjoy it nearly as much as this one (which is odd considering this was her first...shouldn't your work improve?). Be warned ahead of time though that this is a "lesbian fiction" book and...it's kinda heavy on the lesbian, so be prepared for that. Not saying it's a bad thing. I just feel compelled to give you a heads up so you're not caught completely off-guard.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-7824705783424792852011-06-05T08:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:10:40.594-07:00ArchEnemy by Frank Beddor<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/ArchEnemy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/ArchEnemy.jpg" t8="true" width="213" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>The war for Wonderland has become a war for Imagination!</em><br />
<em>King Arch has declared himself King of Wonderland as Alyss searches wildly for the solution to the metaphysical disaster that has engulfed her Queendom. The power of Imagination has been lost!</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>Alyss's search for answers takes her to London where Arch's assassins threaten Alice Liddell and her family. But after coming to her adopted family's assistance, Alyss discovers herself trapped in a conundrum of evaporating puddles. The shimmering portals that exist to transport her home through the Pool of Tears are disappearing! What is happening in Wonderland? Deep within the Valley of Mushrooms the Caterpillar Oracles issue this prophecy: "Action shall be taken to ensure the safety of the Heart Crystal. For Everqueen." But who is Everqueen?</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
So...the third and final book in the <em>Looking Glass Wars</em> trilogy. I'd like to say it was a vast improvement from the previous two installments, but that would be a lie. It was pretty much another 370 pages of the same. Mediocre writing, sloppy sentence structures and a shaky plot.<br />
<br />
This review's gonna be pretty abbreviated. I really can't write another blog about how it's not great but it's not horrible. So I'm just gonna add a couple more comments that came to me, while taking notes on this reading experience.<br />
<br />
Beddor has this strange habit of making up a word or device, but failing to adequately define what exactly it means. The idea of creating your own world of inventions isn't an unheard of practice in the sci-fi/fantasy genre, but the fact that he consistently names off gadgets and fails to even give a basic description was slightly annoying. I could get an idea in my head that would do for the sake of picturing actions in my head, but the fact that I don't what I should be imagining took away from the ability to know that I was on the same proverbial page as the author.<br />
<br />
This strange practice is made further confusing by Beddor's almost anal attention to detail in other aspects of the story. He went so far as to make the Lewis Carroll in the book have a stutter (something which a quick Google search shows me was factual), but then is completely lax on defining what a "smail-transport" is. Odd, to say the least.<br />
<br />
I also found myself a little put off by Beddor's need to write in sound effects. I didn't like being taken out of the story, cause I had to spend an unnecessary length of time trying to figure out the pronunciation of "feeeeeeeooooooshhhhkaaaghghgk". "Bang", "boom" or even "fwoosh" would do the job just as easily and my brain doesn't try to eat itself.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, same as the last two, it's a decent read for a boring afternoon with nothing else to do. I can't say it's a great ending to the trilogy, but it's passable.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-58561763410090159922011-06-03T08:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:10:05.933-07:00Seeing Redd by Frank Beddor<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/SeeingRedd.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/SeeingRedd.jpg" t8="true" width="213" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Alyss of Wonderland’s rule has only just begun and already those who prefer chaos to peace are threatening to destroy everything worth imagining. Trailed by newly appointed Royal Bodyguard Homburg Molly, Alyss does her best to keep pace with the spiraling, non-stop demands of being Queen while attempting to evade Molly for a few private moments with Dodge. Alyss’s life is already a challenging mix of duty, love and imagining when a series of phantom sightings set fire to an urban myth of her Imperial Viciousness’s return and have everyone…Seeing Redd.</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>Has Redd somehow freed herself and her chief assassin, the Cat, from the confines of the Heart Crystal to challenge her niece once again? If not, then who has resurrected Redd’s brutal footsoldiers, the Glass Eyes, and set them loose to attack Wonderland on all sides? Battles rage, looking glasses explode and the Alyssians are once again uniting to defend White Imagination in this fast-paced second book in</em> The Looking Glass Wars <em>trilogy.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
So...for obvious reasons, I found that the second book in the <em>Looking Glass Wars</em> trilogy suffers from pretty much the same problems as the first book did.<br />
<br />
Like with <em>The Looking Glass Wars</em>, the writing and story are by no means horrible, but they're not exactly great either. Beddor seems to have frequent issues with adequately conveying his ideas. I found myself having to read and re-read sentences, before I could really figure out what exactly he was trying to say.<br />
<br />
Beddor also has a few issues with showing the reader where his characters are at, emotionally. I found myself spending most of the book thinking that one particular character was a bad guy masquerading as good, only to find out that that was never supposed to be the case. And, no...that wasn't me misinterpreting what was written. He honestly presented the character in a way that made it seem 100% that they were completely aware of certain facts, only to claim complete ignorance to the fact later. It was weird and I can't adequately explain exactly what I'm talking about, without spoiling a few key points.<br />
<br />
On a side note, to anyone that does read any of the books, what is up with Hatter's backpack? No matter how many times I read the description of it, I cannot for the life of me get what it does. Is it a Swiss Army knife? Corkscrews? Really? I'd be far more accepting of the idea, if it didn't sound completely ludicrous (and that means something, when you're reviewing a book set in Wonderland).<br />
<br />
Bottom line, if you read the first book, you'll probably find yourself gravitating toward this one too. They're both decent enough that you'll probably want to find out how the rest of the story pans out.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-81825928320920183702011-06-01T08:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:08:55.518-07:00The Looking Glass Wars by Frank Beddor<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/LookingGlassWars.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/LookingGlassWars.jpg" t8="true" width="212" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Alyss Heart, heir to the Wonderland throne, was forced to flee through the Pool of Tears after a bloody palace coup staged by the murderous Redd shattered her world. Lost and alone in Victorian London, Alyss is befriended by an aspiring author to whom she tells the surreal, violent, heartbreaking story of her young life only to see it published as the nonsensical children’s sojourn Alice in Wonderland. Alyss had trusted Lewis Carroll to tell the truth so that someone, somewhere would find her and bring her home.</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<span class="justify"><em>But Carroll had got it all wrong. He even misspelled her name! If not for the intrepid Hatter Madigan, a member of the Millinery (Wonderland’s security force) who after a 13 year search eventually tracked Alyss to London, she may have become just another society woman sipping tea in a too-tight bodice instead of returning to Wonderland to battle Redd for her rightful place as the Queen of Hearts.</em></span><br />
<br />
<span class="justify">---</span><br />
<br />
<span class="justify">I went ahead and read the original two Alice stories, before starting on this book. I figured it might help to have the originals fresh in my mind, before diving into the "true story" version. It in no way helped.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="justify">That's not to say the book was bad. On the contrary I enjoyed it. I mean, don't get me wrong. This was definitely not a book aimed at my age range or reading level. There's a good reason you'll find it in the teen section of the library. It's quite simply because it's just not that challenging of a read. It's a fun read, but not a challenge.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="justify">To begin with, the story is a little slow. Interesting, but not exactly action packed. The writing's juvenile at times, but I really can't get myself to hold a book based on a children's story aimed at teenagers to a very high standard. I know some of you may disagree, but that's just my opinion. I'd say this falls about "middle of the road", as far as writing skills are concerned. Not great, but by no means horrible.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="justify">One interesting thing I noticed was a strong similarity between Redd's queendom (yes...QUEENdom) and the society depicted within one of my previous reads...<a href="http://ghostswerepeopletoo.blogspot.com/2010/04/1984-by-george-orwell.html">1984</a>. This could go either of two ways. Either Beddor was paying homage to Orwell...or he was ripping him off and counting on his teenage readers to be not well-read enough to realize. I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt here. What can I say? I'm in a good mood.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="justify">One thing would have made this book substantially better. If it had no tie <em>Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.</em> Honestly, aside from the tie-in of having Carroll publish Alyss's story, there really wasn't much point to tying one to the other. <em>The Looking Glass Wars</em> can stand perfectly well on it's own. References to the original work are barely noticeable and not all that important in the grand scheme. Having the books connected seems to serve more as free publicity for Beddor's work. Like <em>Alice in Wonderland</em> Why not read this book too, then? Pointless.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="justify">Bottom line, it's a decent book. Like I said, not great but not horrible. Definitely a book to read if you've got an hour or so to spare and wanna give your brain a little rest.</span><br />
<br />
<span class="justify">~Missy</span>Missyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-10792664506056184882011-05-30T14:06:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:08:32.687-07:00Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/JaneEyre.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/JaneEyre.jpg" t8="true" width="202" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Orphaned into the household of her Aunt Reed at Gateshead, subject to the cruel regime at Lowood charity school, Jane Eyre nonetheless emerges unbroken in spirit and integrity. She takes up the post of governess at Thornfield, falls in love with Mr. Rochester, and discovers the impediment to their lawful marriage in a story that transcends melodrama to portray a woman's passionate search for a wider and richer life than Victorian society traditionally allowed.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Oh my god...I loved this book. I seriously have no idea why it's taken me this long to read it (both in the length of time it took me to start and in how long it finally took me to finish). It was, hands down, one of the best books I've ever read.<br />
<br />
I normally don't enjoy the so-called classics that much. They tend to be sort of...boring. I find them way too descriptive of unimportant things and, as a result, they seem to drag on into eternity. I didn't feel that way with <em>Jane Eyre</em>. Don't get me wrong, it was definitely one of my slower reads, but it didn't have that same uninteresting feel that most slow-reads give me.<br />
<br />
I did find the start of the book to be sort of dreary, but that just added to the overall feel of Jane's progression through life and further emphasized just how strong of a character she becomes. The poor girl goes through all this hardship in her childhood and early adult life and still comes out with her head held high. Very inspiring.<br />
<br />
Don't even get me started on Rochester. Jane and Rochester's relationship, I feel, rivals Elizabeth Bennett and Mr. Darcy. Seriously. I don't know why I've never heard about Edward Rochester, prior to reading this book. Very underrated character, if you ask me. Love him.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, definitely read it...obviously. You won't be disappointed. I loved it completely,<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-37517386901925147792011-04-03T21:45:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:07:45.003-07:00The Dirty Parts of the Bible by Sam Torode<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/DirtyPartsoftheBible.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/DirtyPartsoftheBible.jpg" t8="true" width="203" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>It's 1936, and Tobias Henry is stuck in the frozen hinterlands of Michigan. Tobias is obsessed with two things: God and girls.</em><br />
<br />
<em>Mostly girls, of course. </em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>But being a Baptist preacher's son, he can't escape God. </em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>When his father is blinded in a bizarre accident (involving hard cider and bird droppings), Tobias must ride the rails to Texas to recover a long-hidden stash of money. Along the way, he's initiated into the hobo brotherhood by Craw, a ribald vagabond-philosopher. Obstacles arise in the form of a saucy prostitute, a flaming boxcar, and a man-eating catfish. But when he meets Sarah, a tough farm girl under a dark curse, he finds out that the greatest challenge of all is love.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Came across this book, thanks to my mom. She'd won a $25 gift certificat for Amazon.com and gave it to me. Used the entire thing to load up on books for my Kindle. The title of this one caught my eye (and was recommeded to me thanks to Amazon), so it made the cut and I couldn't wait to read it. Dirty parts of the Bible? SO THERE!!<br />
<br />
So not.<br />
<br />
This wasn't a horrible book. Far from that. I did like it. I just didn't <em>love</em> it. The characters were a little blah and the "naive preacher's son going out into the big strange world" motif's a little played out. On top of that, it wasn't that long and, just when it started to get somewhere, it was done. I could have done with a little less build-up and more of a payoff.<br />
<br />
When I got to the end of the book, I found out that the book was a modern re-telling of some old Jewish story that I'd never heard of, which in no way made me all that eager to read the original tale. I can't imagine it being even remotely more interesting than the book.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, probably one to skip. Like I said, it wasn't horrible, but it's not a book that would immediately pop into my head if someone were to ask me for a book recommendation. Read it, if you want, but it's not really worth it, in my opinion.<br />
<br />
~Missy<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhM3i23gIEDhEne22zIU_nn4rbOiYvKpfjl2IStqvmy-okgBuPvFfbhZLjl9sD86p1mI9RwauMo1RaR42-6_1epNilqhF48awVXkNVh25MsNrU8FuNjpOoF-GakfWD-gBgtcx4_m77y1bI/s1600/Jane+Eyre.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a>Missyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-31814520717467735562011-04-02T09:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:07:22.941-07:00Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/WaterforElephants.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/WaterforElephants.jpg" t8="true" width="213" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>As a young man, Jacob Jankowski was tossed by fate onto a rickety train that was home to the Benzini Brothers Most Spectacular Show on Earth. It was the early part of the great Depression, and for Jacob, now ninety, the circus world he remembers was both his salvation and a living hell. A veterinary student just shy of a degree, he was put in charge of caring for the circus menagerie. It was there that he met Marlena, the beautiful equestrian star married to August, the charismatic but twisted animal trainer. And he met Rosie, an untrainable elephant who was the great gray hope for this third-rate traveling show. The bond that grew among this unlikely trio was one of love and trust, and, ultimately, it was their only hope for survival.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
To begin with, let me tell you why I chose this book. To put it simply, I saw the trailer for the movie based on it. Prior to that, I really hadn't given the idea of reading the book much (if any) thought, but I caught the trailer and it actually piqued my interest, so I decided to give it a chance.<br />
<br />
I'm glad I did. I really enjoyed it. It was a lot like <em>The Green Mile</em> (one of my favorite books) in the structure of the storytelling: An elderly man in a nursing home, reflecting back on an important time in his life. I only just now realized that simialrity. Subliminal messages luring me in, perhaps? The book was a pretty fast read. I mean, I do tend to breeze through books, when I enjoy them, but even I was surprised by how easily I read this (12 hours off and on).<br />
<br />
The subject matter was fascinating. The fact that Gruen actually took the time to heavily research travelling circuses just made it even more interesting, because it was accurate (allegedly. Can't say I've been involved in too many circus acts, so kind of have to take her word for it).<br />
<br />
Complaints? The plot was a little lost on me. It just seemed like there were events that occured but nothing really pressed the story forward. That's not to say it was boring, but it just seemed a little flat. No real rise and fall.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, I'd recommend it. Especially if you plan to see the movie. I've heard they're changing the ending (to what, I don't know), so it presents a good opportunity to see whether or not Hollywood can manage to change without ruining. In my opinion, the ending doesn't need changing, but...we'll see.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-17787255361668942742011-04-01T09:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:06:54.427-07:00Heat Wave by Richard Castle<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/HeatWave.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/HeatWave.jpg" t8="true" width="220" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>A New York real estate tycoon plunges to his death on a Manhattan sidewalk. A trophy wife with a past survives a narrow escape from a brazen attack. Mobsters and moguls with no shortage of reasons to kill trot out their alibis. And then, in the suffocating grip of a record heat wave, comes another shocking murder and a sharp turn in a tense journey into the dirty little secrets of the wealthy. Secrets that prove to be fatal. Secrets that lay hidden in the dark until one NYPD detective shines a light.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
So I liked this book. I really did. For anyone that's a fan of the show <em>Castle,</em> it's definitely am emjoyable read. If you follow the show closely like I do, you'll know that "Richard Castle" drew inspiration for the Nikki Heat books from his own experiences tailing detectives of the NYPD and each of his police characters are inspired by a "real" NYPD detective. Rook's relationship with Heat almost mirrors Castle's relationship with Beckett. Almost. It was well-written, considering it's supposed to come from an author that doesn't technically exist.<br />
<br />
That being said, this book was pretty much an episode of <em>Castle</em> in book-form. That's not exactly a bad thing, but if you're going to essentially turn your show into a book, you might as well just write a <em>Castle </em>tie-in novel and market it as such. Don't try to sell it as a seperate entity.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, if you like <em>Castle,</em> you'll like this book. If you've never seen <em>Castle</em>, you'll probably still enjoy and, as an added bonus, you might feel compelled to watch the show, which is a must-see.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-52929727726050883342011-03-31T11:22:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:06:39.997-07:00Night Shift by Stephen King<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/NightShift.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/NightShift.jpg" t8="true" width="195" /></a></div><strong>Synopsis</strong><br />
<br />
<em>In places where fear swells and blood runs cold, sinister forces and unspeakable things are working the night shift.</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>From the depths of darkness, where hideous rats defend their empire, to dizzying heights, where a beautiful girl hangs by a hair above hellish fate, this chilling collection of twenty short stories will plunge you into the subterranean labyrinth of the most spine-tingling, eerie imagination of our time.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
I love Stephen King. I really do. He is without a doubt one of my favorite authors...if not <em>the</em> favorite. He never fails to completely captivate me and suck me into his stories.<br />
<br />
With that in mind, it pains me to say that I didn't really like this book. I think my main problem was the fact that it was completely short stories, which yes I knew going into it. The thing I love most about King's writing is the constant build-up and release of tension. The suspense is the best part and, when it comes to short stories, there's usually only one build-up and one release. That's not enough for me.<br />
<br />
Now, it wasn't all bad for me. Of the twenty stories, I did really enjoy three of them. "Trucks", "Sometimes They Come Back" and "Children of the Corn" were all really good. Why, you might ask? Because all three were made into movies that I had already seen and so I already had an appreciation for. Even then though, the stories weren't nearly as suspenseful for me as the movies were. One of the rare occasions where the "book" falls short of the movie.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, it's not a completely horrible collection of stories. If the author had been anyone other than King, I would fully give it two thumbs up. Because it was King and I had these huge expectations for mini-<em>Shining</em>s, I'll give it one and a quarter thumbs.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-66770879329855393232011-01-05T17:05:00.000-08:002011-07-22T17:06:26.579-07:00The Girl Who Played with Fire by Stieg Larsson<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/GirlWhoPlayedWithFire.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/GirlWhoPlayedWithFire.jpg" t8="true" width="207" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Mikael Blomkvist, crusading journalist and publisher of the magazine Millennium, has decided to run a story that will expose an extensive sex trafficking operation between Eastern Europe and Sweden, implicating well-known and highly placed members of Swedish society, business, and government.</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>But he has no idea just how explosive the story will be until, on the eve of publication, the two investigating reporters are murdered. And even more shocking for Blomkvist: the fingerprints found on the murder weapon belong to Lisbeth Salander.</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>As Blomkvist, alone in his belief in Salander’s innocence, plunges into an investigation of the slayings, Salander herself is drawn into a murderous hunt in which she is the prey, and which compels her to revisit her dark past in an effort to settle with it once and for all.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
A lot of hype comes with this book, as well as with <em>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo </em>and <em>The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest.</em> With that much expectation, a book is almost certainly doomed to fail. Fortunately, that didn't happen here. I completely enjoyed this book (Side note: The first book I got to read on my brand new Kindle). Even more than I enjoyed reading <em>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</em>, something I didn't actually realize until I sat down to the write this review.<br />
<br />
While reading, I found myself feeling that the story didn't progress as quickly as it did in the first book (and even in the first book, it took a while to get going). As I got to the end, I almost felt like it was rushed. It seemed like everything suddenly got wrapped up within the last few pages (or "pages" as far as the Kindle is concerned). Now, that I'm typing this review, I can honestly say it had a nice pace. Sort of an abrupt ending, but that's to be expected with the middle book of a trilogy.<br />
<br />
Larsson has (had?) an insane ability to really give his less desirable male characters these disgustingly misogynistic traits. If I didn't already know his inspiration for writing the <em>Millennium Trilogy</em>, I'd be tempted to think that he honestly harbored that attitude toward women. His writing is that good, in my opinion. Another thing I enjoyed about his storytelling was that he would plug in references to actual events in Swedish history, within the story. I don't know. Maybe other authors do it too and I just never noticed, cause I subconsciously understood and didn't have to actively look them up, like I did with the references in this book (and also in <em>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</em>).<br />
<br />
So...bottom line, I would definitely recommend reading this book. Obviously, you'd need to read <em>The Girl Who Played with Fire</em> first, but it's definitely worth the read. I look forward to reading <em>The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest.</em> Unfortunately, that will not be next. These books cover subject matter that just leave me needing a happy little break between stories.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-64569961372194085672011-01-03T16:20:00.000-08:002011-01-03T16:21:33.952-08:00I'm BackSo...for Christmas, I recieved an Amazon Kindle. This means it's going to be so much easier to get in some reading, cause no matter how long the story, I won't have to lug around a huge book anymore.<br />
<br />
So...I'm reviving my book-it list.<br />
<br />
Currently reading and next to be reviewed...<br />
<br />
The Girl Who Played with Fire by Stieg Larsson<br />
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/GirlWhoPlayedWithFire.jpg" /><br />
<br />
While I was takign my break from this blog, I actually read the first of Larsson's books, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. At this point, it's been too long for me to write a decent review, but I can say that I enjoyed it and would recommend people read it.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-53703186662120026902010-09-22T20:41:00.000-07:002010-09-22T20:41:52.555-07:00Temporarily On Hold/Slowed DownYeah. So...I'm back in school and of course every one of my classes involves a bunch of reading, so I don't know exactly how much time I'll have for recreational reading.<br />
<br />
That being said, this blog is either going to be dead until the end of the quarter (12/10/2010) or the reviews will be even more infrequent than usual.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-71631043419588760492010-09-15T01:09:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:04:44.258-07:00Will Storr vs. the Supernatural by Will Storr<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/WillStorrvstheSupernatural.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/WillStorrvstheSupernatural.jpg" t8="true" width="209" /></a></div><strong>Synopsis</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Will Storr has done some seriously bizarre and other-wordly things over the course of his career as a journalist. But even spending an entire day with Ozzy Osbourne wasn't as frightening as when he agreed to follow Philadelphia "demonologist" Lou Gentile on his appointed round. Will Storr never believed in ghosts--but his healthy skepticism couldn't explain the strange lights and sounds he witnessed, and the weird behavior of the occupants of several allegedly haunted houses.</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>What resulted is a confirmed cynic's (and proud of it!) dedicated search for answers in a shadowy world of seances, mediums, devil worshippers--even the Vatican's chief exorcist. So get ready to confront the genuinely creepy along with the hilariously ridiculous in</em> Will Storr vs. the Supernatural<em>!</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
After my last three books, I thought it was about time I get back to reading books where I don't already know the ending. What better way to do that than to read a work of non-fiction?<br />
<br />
I was surprised by this book. I went into it expecting to get a straight-forward progression from complete skeptic to full-on believer. That did not happen. The book basically involves a cynic having this beliefs (or lack thereof) tested. Storr attends countless paranormal research events, meets with renowned investigators, questions a philosopher, interviews a psychiatrist and sits down with an exorcist.<br />
<br />
Ultimately, he finishes completely unsure about whether or not the paranormal exists, but that's fine. The guy did his research. I'm surprised the guy lasted a year. I would have slapped every psychic he came in contact with. His experiences with psychics and mediums were so awkward (not written awkwardly...like the situations themselves were awkward). I would not have been able to smile and nod the way he did.<br />
<br />
One complaint...and it really has nothing to do with the content of the book. My complaint...WHO THE HELL EDITED THIS BOOK?! I can understand the occasional spelling error (and I had to have a little leeway for the fact that Storr is British and so you get the expected differences), but there were words that were consistently just flat out spelled wrong. Spell check is your friend, people. Look into it.<br />
<br />
Bottom line...read it. No matter who you are, read. Originally, I was just going to recommend this to people who are believers. As the book went on though, I changed my mind. No matter which side of the paranormal fence you fall on, I think this is a book to read. It makes you consider things maybe you haven't thought of before. It's not shy about revealing the seedy underbelly of TV ghost hunting programs. Hell...it makes it painfully obvious just how full of it some psychics and mediums are. Read it.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-55323435042510173312010-09-13T17:52:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:01:46.502-07:00My Sister's Keeper by Jodi Picoult<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/MySistersKeeper.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/MySistersKeeper.jpg" t8="true" width="205" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Anna is not sick, but she might as well be. By age thirteen, she has undergone countless surgeries, transfusions, and shots so that her older sister, Kate, can somehow fight the leukemia that has plagued her since childhood. The product of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Anna was conceived as a bone marrow match for Kate--a life role that she has never challenged...until now. Like most teenagers, Anna is beginning to question who she truly is. But unlike most teenagers, she has always been defined in terms of her sister. So, Anna makes a decision that for most would be unthinkable--a decision that will tear her family apart and possibly have fatal consequences for the sister she loves.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
This book made me cry. That really says a lot. In my twenty-six years in this world, only one other book has ever made me truly cry. I'm not talking about just tearing up a little. I'm talking about choked up, sad movie crying.<br />
<br />
On that subject, let me say...yes. I had seen the movie, prior to reading the book. I try to keep that from being the case. I honestly prefer to read the book, before viewing the movie, but there are those rare occasions where the movie somehow manages to be viewed before I can read the book (I blame HBO and insomnia in this case). I had a feeling this book was going to make cry, given that the movie had me crying for about 90 of the 100 minutes.<br />
<br />
Anyway...the book's a really good read. The ending was a little...eh. Without giving too much away (cause it does end far differently than the movie), I kind of didn't see any purpose to what happens in the end. You go through the events of the book and to have this final event (god...it's hard to review this without giving it away) occur seemed a little...pointless? I don't know, maybe other people would get the value of it, but it completely eluded me.<br />
<br />
My only complaint (aside from the "event") was some of the characters. Not so much the way they were written. They were written perfectly. The characters as people bugged me. Their behavior, more specifically, annoyed me. Between Sara's inability to understand Anna's reasons for filing the lawsuit and Jesse constantly lashing out, I found it hard to really tolerate them at times. I'm sure it's all in the eyes of the reader, though. Maybe other can better accept the way they act, but I found it a little grating.<br />
<br />
Bottom line...definitely read it. It's a really touching book and raises a few important questions...like is it alright to just let someone die? So...read it and form your own opinions.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-50836741017146923252010-08-24T12:18:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:00:29.774-07:00Living Dead In Dallas by Charlaine Harris<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/LivingDeadInDallas.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/LivingDeadInDallas.jpg" t8="true" width="197" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>When a vampire asks cocktail waitress Sookie Stackhouse for a favor, she complies. And soon she's in Dallas, using her telepathic skills to search for a missing vampire. She agrees to interview the humans involved as long as the bloodsuckers promise to let them go unharmed. Easier said than done. All it takes is one delicious blonde and one small mistake for things to turn deadly.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Another great Sookie Stackhouse book. Another example of why the books and <em>True Blood</em> are separate entities.<br />
<br />
I really enjoyed this book, for pretty much the same reasons as <em>Dead Until Dark.</em> There really isn't much else to add. I like Charlaine Harris' writing style. I like her characters. There's honestly nothing I'd really change. Like I said last time though, having seen the show and already being familiar with the characters and the story, there is a good deal of bias. I can't say for certain that my opinion would be the same, had I gone into this series completely unfamiliar, but to the best of my abilities, I tried to find faults and there were none.<br />
<br />
I am starting to see why some fans of the book don't like the show too much, though. For what was changed in Season 1, they really veered off from the book for Season 2. Like...<em>really</em> veered off. To the point that I wonder if they could even continue to follow, the books on the show. But, I'm getting off point. This is about <em>Living Dead in Dallas</em>...not <em>True Blood.</em><br />
<br />
This is definitely a book to read, assuming you enjoyed <em>Dead Until Dark</em> (which you should have), but do not go into it expecting it to be the book version of <em>True Blood</em>.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-47729418645844028412010-08-10T12:03:00.000-07:002011-07-22T17:00:09.686-07:00Dead Until Dark by Charlaine Harris<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/DeadUntilDark.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/DeadUntilDark.jpg" t8="true" width="203" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>Sookie Stackhouse is just a small-time cocktail waitress in small-town Louisiana--except for her "disability." She can read minds. But when Bill Compton walks into her life, she can't hear a word he's thinking--and then then one of her co-workers is killed.</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>Maybe having a vampire for a boyfriend isn't such a bright idea...</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Right upfront, let me explain to you that this review will be ever so slightly biased. For those of you that (somehow) don't know, the Sookie Stackhouse novels are the basis for HBO's show True Blood. That being said, I started reading this book having already seen the first season of True Blood (which is an adaptation of this book). Actually I'd seen it twice, so...I pretty much knew the major plot points and twists.<br />
<br />
On top of going into this already knowing the end, I also went in having read some of the disapproval Sookie Stackhouse fans had toward the way the first book had been adapted. That being said, I'll get started on my review.<br />
<br />
To begin with, the book's a really good read. Usually, when I've seen the movie/TV show before reading the book, the book tends to drag for me, because I go in expecting a certain pace. That was not the case here. In fact, if it was dragging because of me seeing True Blood, then I can only imagine how much faster I could have read this book. I flew through this book like it was nothing (my copy clocks in at 312 pages). It was a phenomenal read. Better than some other vampire books that I've read recently (*cough*Twilight*cough*).<br />
<br />
As for a book/True Blood comparison, I definitely view the book as being a whole other entity. The show strayed from the book enough that I'm curious to see how things pan out in the books. A certain character, who shall remain nameless, survives the book. They do not survive the show. I'm very curious to see whether or not he/she reappear in subsequent books (don't say anything, for those that have read the books and know which character I'm talking about).<br />
<br />
At this point, I would usually start listing off what didn't work for me in the book. I'm surprised to say that I've got nothing. I seriously liked everything about this book. The entire time I was reading, there wasn't a single instance where I wished something had been written differently. It was perfect. I loved the writing. I loved the characters. I wouldn't change a single thing. I loved it.<br />
<br />
I think you can figure out my botton line, but I'll say it anyway. I definitely...DEFINITELY...recommend this book.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-55632669872606832882010-05-11T11:05:00.000-07:002011-07-22T16:59:12.011-07:00Le Grand Meaulnes by Alain-Fournier<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/LeGrandMeaulnes.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/LeGrandMeaulnes.jpg" t8="true" width="206" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>When Meaulnes first arrives at the local school in Sologne, everyone is captivated by his good looks, daring, and charisma. But when he disappears for several days, and returns with tales of a strange party at a mysterious house and a beautiful girl hidden within it, Meaulnes has been changed forever. In his restless search for his Lost Estate and the happiness he found there, Meaulnes, observed by his loyal friend Francois, may risk losing everything he ever had.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
I really only have one word for this book: Blah. It wasn’t that great of a read. I mean, it had a lot of potential, but I just wasn’t feeling it. I never really felt for any of the characters, so I didn’t really care whether or not any of them found what they were seeking.<br />
<br />
I read this book, because it was listed in 501 Must-Read Books. Truth be told, that will be my reason behind about two-thirds of the books on my “To Read” List. Anyway, I cannot for the life of me figure out why Le Grand Meaulnes was classified as a “Must-Read”. Like I said, it wasn’t too spectacular.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, read it if you want, but it’s not a book that would pop into my head, if someone were to ask me for a recommendation on their next read.<br />
<br />
~Missy<br />
<br />
P.S.<br />
If you do decide to read this book, you'll find it under its English title The Lost Estate.Missyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-30467943905278847982010-04-23T10:26:00.000-07:002011-07-22T16:58:54.814-07:001984 by George Orwell<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/1984.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/1984.jpg" t8="true" width="198" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>The story of Winston Smith presents the world in the year 1984, after a global atomic war, via his perception of life in Airstrip One, a province of Oceania, one of the world's three superstates; his intellectual rebellion against the Party and illicit romance with Julia; and his consequent imprisonment, interrogation, torture, and re-education by the Thinkpol in the Miniluv.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Let me just get this fact out of the way, right up front. Read this book. Not just because it's a good book. Not just because it's one of those books you're <em>expected</em> to have read. Not just because it's gives a look at what our lives could be like, if we stop thinking for ourselves. It's because of all of those. You're supposed to have read this book at some point (usually in high school) and, having now read it, I can tell you that it's worth the read. Alright. Now that I have that out of the way, I can get to my actual review.<br />
<br />
This book was depressing and scary, at the same time. Imagine a world where it's illegal to <em>think</em> something other than what the government tells you. If they tell you that two plus two equals five, it equals five. If you think otherwise, you die. Not even a second chance. One time and you're doomed to die. I cannot wrap my mind around the idea of living in a world where you no longer have freedom of <em>thought</em>. It's such a small act, thinking, but to have that ability taken away would be unbearable.<br />
<br />
What's scarier is that, while 1984 (the year) may have been 26 years ago, I saw <em>a lot</em> of similarities between Orwell's 1984 and our 2010. Granted...not as extreme as in the book, but I could spot places where we, as a society, are beginning to go down that road. Let's just say I kind of feel for the people we pass on street screaming about Big Brother watching...cause I kind of think he might be.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, like I said, read this book. Orwell is an <em>amazing</em> writer. I usually don't enjoy the books that you're supposed to have read in high school, but I couldn't put this one down. And, not just the writing. This book opened my eyes to a lot of things that even I do. It made me want to pay even more attention to things that go on in our world, cause I never want to see a poster on every corner telling me that "Big Brother is watching you".<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-69043380568020263082010-04-21T09:00:00.000-07:002011-07-22T16:58:19.349-07:00The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/TheLovelyBones.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/TheLovelyBones.jpg" t8="true" width="213" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>"My name was Salmon, like the fish; first name, Susie. I was fourteen when I was murdered on December 6, 1973."</em><br />
<em><br />
</em><br />
<em>So begins the story of Susie Salmon, who is adjusting to her new home in heaven, a place that is not at all what she expected, even as she is watching life on earth continue without her — her friends trading rumors about her disappearance, her killer trying to cover his tracks, her grief-stricken family unraveling.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
First and foremost, I loved this book. I completely understand both its popularity among readers and the decision to make it into a full-length film (although I realize that doesn't say much considering Hollywood's never ending desire to turn everything into a movie). It makes you think. Granted...I'm not talking about some deep soul searching, where you come out changed for the better, when it's all over, but it's not mindless drivel either.<br />
<br />
To avoid going into too much detail and potentially ruining the book for you, I'll just touch on a few of the things I liked about the book. First of all, I enjoyed the idea of missed opportunities and "what ifs". Susie narrates the entire book, while she watches from heaven as her family continues on without her. She has to watch her younger siblings go through things that she will never have the chance to experience. It makes you realize that tomorrow is not a guarantee. You can't always count on being able to "do it tomorrow", because you don't know what's just around the corner for you. You could drop dead right now and be stuck in eternity thinking "I should have done it."<br />
<br />
I really enjoyed Sebold's writing. There was just something about the way she wrote the book that made me truly feel for the characters. I felt sorry for Jack Salmon, Susie's father. I wanted so badly for him to get his wish and catch Susie's killer. I loathed George Harvey and, at every turn, wanted him to be caught and punished for what he did to Susie. I hated, hated, hated Abigail Salmon, Susie's mother, for seemingly turning her back on the pain and suffering of her own children and husband for her own needs. It's rare that I find a book where I honestly empathize with characters. Normally, I just know what they're going through, but don't feel any real emotion about their ultimate fates. With <em>The Lovely Bones</em>, I wanted to climb into the book and just make everything better.<br />
<br />
Finally, there was heaven. I liked that it wasn't overtly religious. In fact, it was, to me at least, completely void of religion. No obligatory angels. No floating on clouds. I appreciated (and actually agreed with) the idea that heaven is whatever you want it to be. It all comes down to what makes you happy.<br />
<br />
Now, on to what I didn't like so much. To begin with, Abigail Salmon. More specifically, her portrayal. Now, I realize I was just commending Sebold on her ability to make you feel what she wants you to feel, but I didn't like how she made me feel about Abigail. I just didn't get why Susie's mother had to be so selfish. What was gained by Abigail's complete lack of caring about how her actions affected not only her husband, but her own children? She just seemed to be all about herself and I couldn't understand why. I'm sure someone can explain, but I'm at a loss.<br />
<br />
Next, there's the characters. More specifically, some of the secondary characters. I realize not everything has to mean something, but there were a couple cases where it seemed like there was a big deal being made about a character that didn't seem to really bring anything significant to the story. One example would be Ruth Cooper. To me, it felt like the only reason she was in the story at all was for the one scene toward the end with Ray Singh (again...trying not to ruin things, so sorry for the vague reference). Hal Heckler kinda seemed pointless too. I kept expecting this big revelation about him that would explain his importance to the overall story, but it never came and it left me wondering why he needed to be there.<br />
<br />
So...bottom line is that I would definitely recommend this book. Personally, I'd read it before seeing the movie, but that's just how I am, so don't feel obligated to follow my word on that part :), but do read the book. You won't regret it.<br />
<br />
~Missy<br />
<br />
P.S.<br />
ONLY READ THE FOLLOWING IF: 1) YOU DON'T MIND HAVING PART OF THE ENDING RUINED OR 2) YOU'VE ALREADY READ THE BOOK.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Do you think Susie had a hand in knocking down the icicle that led to Mr. Harvey's demise?Missyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-57448151168765364342010-04-18T18:16:00.000-07:002011-07-22T16:57:20.971-07:00Under the Dome by Stephen King<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/UndertheDome.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/AuriliaGirl35/Book%20Covers/UndertheDome.jpg" t8="true" width="209" /></a></div><strong>Plot</strong><br />
<br />
<em>On an entirely normal, beautiful fall day in Chester’s Mill, Maine, the town is inexplicably and suddenly sealed off from the rest of the world by an invisible force field. No one can fathom what this barrier is, where it came from, and when — or if — it will go away.</em><br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
I loved this book. Or, I should say, I loved reading it. The story itself was a little odd, but I say that for one reason and one reason only. It remind so very much of The Simpsons Movie. I tried so hard to keep that out of my head, while I was reading, but I could not keep it out entirely. More on that.<br />
<br />
For anyone that has seen The Simpsons Movie, I think you can see where my mind was getting stuck on the movie, just by looking at the book's title...Under the Dome. I remember reading, before the book came out, that King had heard about the comparisons to the Simpsons movie. He commented that the comparisons ended at the town being placed under a mysterious dome. Nope. The comparisons go beyond that. Don't get me wrong, though. It didn't take away from the book. The similar plot points, while being very obvious, were much darker in the book. As they should be, given that this is Stephen King. And, it's not as if The Simpsons were constantly at the back of my mind, while I read. It was just occasionally that the little voice in my head would scream out "SIMPSONS!!"<br />
<br />
The book's full of characters you love to love and characters you love to hate. On second thought, to be totally honest, I don't think it's a love to hate. It's just straight up hate. There are characters throughout the book that I found myself wishing would just die, because there was just absolutely nothing redeeming about them. I found this to be both a strong point and a weakness to the book. You hate them so much that you keep reading, just so you can get to the part where they die a horrible death. At the same time, you hate them so much that their inevitable death just does not come fast enough and, in one case, was not horrible enough.<br />
<br />
Bottom line, this is a book to read. Maybe not if you're a Bible-Thumping Republican. Let's be honest, if you're a Bible lovin' conservative and read this book, you're probably going to want to burn it, when you're done. And, I don't mean the "Oh this book was horrible" sort of book burning. I mean in the "Fahrenheit 451/Books lead to knowledge/Harry Potter promotes the occult" sort of book burning...if you catch my drift.<br />
<br />
~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9026840979062631598.post-89140263315919852132010-04-15T12:46:00.000-07:002010-04-15T12:47:52.951-07:00SorryI know. This blog is currently dead. As soon as I decided to start this blog, I suddenly had a million things to do, so I haven't had much time to read. I am back to reading though, so hopefully I'll be able to get my first actual review up within the next week.<br /><br />~MissyMissyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07853512337464708303noreply@blogger.com0